Wow!

-
It's both weird and sad when a major anniversary passes you don't even realize it until it has passed.

This past Thursday, October 4th, was the 50th anniversary of the Sputnik I launch. It was one of those moments when history itself was changed forever.

Americans, and the rest of the world, woke up, realizing that the Soviet Union had a huge technological advantage over everyone else. The United States launched its own space program with an unprecedented fervor. Shortly after that, President John F. Kennedy challenged the nation to send a man to the moon and return him safely home.

It's just sad that an anniversary like this didn't get more attention in the news media. I did a quick Google search and only found one published news article from any of the major media outlets that talked about it. (Kudos, by the way, to everyone at USA Today for not dropping the ball.)

Oh, and I realize that this makes me a total geek, but I got a huge thrill out of listening to a recording of Sputnik's telemetry broadcast on NASA's web site.

Comments

Liza said…
It's true that if you only search for "sputnik," the returns are kinda sad. But if you include the name of a specific newspaper or magazine, you'll find a happer result. "sputnik newspaper" works well too.

I knew there had to be more coverage on it, since i had read an essay in Time, so US News wasn't the only one: "Space Brains"

And it looks like The Detroit News and Freep ran differently titled copies of the Associated Press article on October 4: "Sputnik launched birth of Space Age" and "Sputnik changed the world"

Glad you blogged about it, though! I think Kluger has an excellent and highly relevant point about today's reactions to national pissing matches when he says, "There was no reason to make the bad guys badder; instead, we ought to make ourselves smarter." I don't see us placing the same emphasis on being smarter now, despite No Child Left Behind Because We Now Give Out More Bs.

^_^
1:43 AM, October 08, 2007
Liza said…
Urgh - I meant "happier" in the first paragraph.

I don't get it - Flickr lets you edit comments, why can't Blogger?

^_^
1:43 AM, October 08, 2007
Frank Nemecek said…
Thanks for the update. As for editing of comments, I've grimaced over some of my own typos as well.

Flickr is owned by Yahoo!, whereas Blogger is a Google operation. Hopefully, the Google people will eventually take the lead from one of the things that their counterparts got right.

Love & laughter,
Frank
11:22 AM, October 08, 2007
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hayley Williams Flashes Twitter

-
Image
I have to confess, I had no idea who Hayley Williams  was prior to this morning nor did I have any idea who the band Paramore was. In fact, now that I do know, I'm not all that certain that I really care about Paramore. But I digress. The thing is, sometime last night, Hayley Williams' Twitter account was reportedly hacked. This resulted in a photo of Hayless Williams topless making its way onto the internet. Hayley Williams insists that it was a simple security breach. Personally, I can't help but feel that this smells too much like a publicity stunt. Either way, the photo is out there and a lot more people suddenly know who Hayley Williams is - coincidence or not. Oh, and yes - it has taken an enormous amount of restraint for me to not show the uncensored version of that photo.
Read more

Bikini Hero

-
Image
I was surfing the web last night, looking for more news on Kristen Bell . I came across this post on TMZ.com about Kristen at the beach . They were critical of the photo of her to the left, but admired her in the one to the right. I don't care what the folks at TMZ say. Granny shades or not. Hair up or down. Kristen Bell looks darn hot.
Read more